if you or anyone would please clarify: is it not the case that the judges in Federal Circuit only rejected changing Kronstadt’s disposition of the case. They asked questions purporting to probe SA’s alleged infringement, but made no ruling whatsoever regarding the validity of our patents (except insofar as not overturning the allegation that a claim #53 of a patent was not i fringed upon)?

I am wanting to keep clear here the distinctions between validity vs. infringement.