(Total Views: 313)
Posted On: 02/12/2019 7:36:57 PM
Post# of 72440
I don't think most people would agree with your interpretation.
To me that is an unequivocal answer that this is not his son's fund.
In the world of reality that most of us dwell in, if your son is employed or a partner in a fund, you could not possibly say that you "met" the fund on your own. Not if you don't want to be sued down the road, and have an SEC investigation.
And you are re-framing your claims. You wrote what you wrote, and it's different from the story you're telling now.
When you're in a hole, stop digging.
To me that is an unequivocal answer that this is not his son's fund.
In the world of reality that most of us dwell in, if your son is employed or a partner in a fund, you could not possibly say that you "met" the fund on your own. Not if you don't want to be sued down the road, and have an SEC investigation.
And you are re-framing your claims. You wrote what you wrote, and it's different from the story you're telling now.
When you're in a hole, stop digging.
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
