So I was here when most of those shares were sold as shorts forced down the price of our stock....as NTEK tried to afford Paramounts 1,000,000 price for content....so NTEK could prove its concept....also during that time NTEK published success after success linking with TV manufacturers various software...developing its cloud based delivery system...proving it could stream better quality product using less power than everyone else in the market...

all during the time when they established their skill at upgrading content using a relatively inexpensive automated system, something that still sets us apart...

and this lawsuit which was never filed is telling me that that period in time was all about David stealing assets and making NTEK judgement proof???

So I assume that the people who planned on filing this lawsuit realized that they actually had to prove them???

Longshanks was the purchaser of debentures??? I thought they provided content that NTEK was unable to pay for???

Who's on First?

Paul