i must have whomever is causing angst on ignore .. because i'm only seeing one side of this conversation .. but if it's an embed *here* trying to create FUD .. there is a very simple reason for it .. which is why i've always noted *volume* tells the tale .. couple that with what daily reg sho %s' get *reported* and it is crystal clear that NR (non retail) is upside down on IPIX .. hence the CON sternation out of those who are *desperate* ..

this is pretty damn simple data to digest

on 4.9.18 .. mgmt changed out pattern and 8k'd a PR .. one week later on 4.16.18 .. mgmt repeated.. pattern of PR being 8k'd .. and yesterday .. PR released re: Evonik .. currently (as of this post) .. that PR has not been 8k'd
( mgmt has 4 business days to do so if so inclined ) ..

so here's the *volume* .. key is 10/90 day avgs .. because the 10 day is far more easily manipulated .. after yesterday's *efforts* (goal yesterday of 400k becomes obvious when data is digested) .. note the *8k* decline on 90 day .. and 5k decline on 10 day (from prior date) .. OUCH (add that to yesterday's 56% markage and it's no wonder embeds are working overtime)

IPIX Volume (10 day Average) 265,825
Volume (90 day Average) 221,558


Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=501...z5DapAfEMS


as a reminder .. here are the avgs on 4.9.18 .. when NR had to *adjust* volume
due to that 90000 10 day avg

IPIX Volume (10 Day Average) 90,757
Volume (90 Day Average) 246,670

that round had % marked @ 48%

as noted numerous times .. %s' don't morph upward when there is *selling* ..
nor do volume avgs *decline*

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5015764

curious to see what *volume* on IPIX reveals this week ..

4kids