(Total Views: 361)
Posted On: 04/17/2018 2:09:10 PM
Post# of 72445
Sox: Please reread my post: "Sox: If they used no wash trades to lower the price, simulate selling and lower the FINRA short percentage, since longs are not selling, today the short percentage likely would have been very close to or at 100% IMO. Go IPIX!"
You said "Alan, I see you are using longs you know aren't selling as a basis to claim every trade was short yesterday. What about the longs you don't know or day traders or Aspire? They aren't shorts. How do you know for sure they didn't sell yesterday?
If you are right, that means FINRA's # is wrong because actual short % is ~100%, not 57%. I wouldn't provide investors with incorrect information. As you said it before, they deserve to know the truth."
I would not have used the words if were I 100% certain. Now let me ask you do you think Aspire is selling shares? I do not. Go IPIX!!!
You said "Alan, I see you are using longs you know aren't selling as a basis to claim every trade was short yesterday. What about the longs you don't know or day traders or Aspire? They aren't shorts. How do you know for sure they didn't sell yesterday?
If you are right, that means FINRA's # is wrong because actual short % is ~100%, not 57%. I wouldn't provide investors with incorrect information. As you said it before, they deserve to know the truth."
I would not have used the words if were I 100% certain. Now let me ask you do you think Aspire is selling shares? I do not. Go IPIX!!!
(1)
(0)
