(Total Views: 179)
Posted On: 02/02/2018 10:19:19 AM
Post# of 72441
Re: NotRichYet2 #41636
exactly .. imo NR is UPSIDE DOWN on IPIX (and imo that % is reflected on an ever increasing daily reg sho % as is shown when viewing month over month)
imo NR loses *liquidity* on a regular basis because by *holding/stalling* PPS
(i call this maintenance) .. they lose one aspect of *liquidity* (those who trade)
there are far easier stox to trade than IPIX ..
so NR has to then *inject* liquidity and imo it's pretty clear (visible) on the historical data that was noted yesterday .. or as i refer to this as NRs' controlled take ups .. imo NR does controlled take ups to pull GTCs' set by investors .. re-pull in traders .. and *Hook* new eyes who naively will hit the ask .. thinking they need to get in immediately .. not realizing the *pattern* firmly embedded for years >> via NR in IPIX ..
4kids
imo NR loses *liquidity* on a regular basis because by *holding/stalling* PPS
(i call this maintenance) .. they lose one aspect of *liquidity* (those who trade)
there are far easier stox to trade than IPIX ..
so NR has to then *inject* liquidity and imo it's pretty clear (visible) on the historical data that was noted yesterday .. or as i refer to this as NRs' controlled take ups .. imo NR does controlled take ups to pull GTCs' set by investors .. re-pull in traders .. and *Hook* new eyes who naively will hit the ask .. thinking they need to get in immediately .. not realizing the *pattern* firmly embedded for years >> via NR in IPIX ..
4kids
Quote:
So for now you see low volume as NOT being a bad thing
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
