Ok, here's my problem with what you just said, you used the word surmise. So you're making a direct connection without concrete proof, and then saying other people here can't do the same thing with other information even though there are plenty of indicators what they're saying is accurate.

So by the basher logic at iHub, despite the fact that it's looking you right in the face you discount it unless hard evidence can be provided that is irrefutable. Kinda like how people over there want to constantly talk about how the company that merged into JBZY in November wasn't ZJMY China even though it's all over the place. Oh wait, that was you too, wasn't it?