(Total Views: 343)
Posted On: 12/08/2017 12:22:13 PM
Post# of 82676
Couple good articles.
Soon after Alice was decided, the PTO issued new guidelines for its examiners.
http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/bu...ass_after/
The Cuozzo case means that the status quo stands for the IPR process. Even if Cuozzo had somehow won, it's debatable how much difference the changed standard would have made. But the fact that the Patent Office's procedures now have the Supreme Court's seal of approval means that IPRs are here to stay and are being run correctly. That's bad news for patent trolls and their allies and good news for everyone else.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/h...eme-court/
GLTA
Soon after Alice was decided, the PTO issued new guidelines for its examiners.
http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/bu...ass_after/
The Cuozzo case means that the status quo stands for the IPR process. Even if Cuozzo had somehow won, it's debatable how much difference the changed standard would have made. But the fact that the Patent Office's procedures now have the Supreme Court's seal of approval means that IPRs are here to stay and are being run correctly. That's bad news for patent trolls and their allies and good news for everyone else.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/h...eme-court/
GLTA
(5)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
