(Total Views: 319)
Posted On: 12/03/2017 12:00:42 PM
Post# of 82677
If you look back at the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in October, the two companies agreed on 12 of the claim terms but disputed 8 of them.
https://jumpshare.com/v/UjUdEUnqrdpJ82AjNh3V
So is Friday's ruling just a ploy to get a better deal and there still will be a settlement? Or if SFOR' appeal is denied the case get's dismissed? Any thoughts on this?
Also I found this going through old posts:
StrikeForce: Opposition to SecureAuth’sMotion to Dismiss
https://jumpshare.com/v/BpyIoipmOIl943YgHvCA
https://jumpshare.com/v/UjUdEUnqrdpJ82AjNh3V
So is Friday's ruling just a ploy to get a better deal and there still will be a settlement? Or if SFOR' appeal is denied the case get's dismissed? Any thoughts on this?
Also I found this going through old posts:
StrikeForce: Opposition to SecureAuth’sMotion to Dismiss
https://jumpshare.com/v/BpyIoipmOIl943YgHvCA
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts â–¼
