I believe Alan's quote is that naked shorters will never , ever cover until "forced to do so". A partnership announcement and the ensuing SP rise and probable uplift would certainly qualify as a "forcing" mechanism. But to say that he posts his daily FINRA numbers to scare away new investors because he is actually a short in a longs attire is ridiculous. If he were a short, he would certainly want new investors, many of whom put stop losses on newly acquired shares. We all know what happens to those shares. I don't know which of you is correct, but I know what my gut tells me, and that is what I go with in lieu of positive eyeball proof. Alan's theory explains much of what is happening with our company, to me. And if a few former posters don't feel welcome here, that's their issue. One of them in particular attacked Alan's credulity by claiming he was actually a short seller engaged in aiding the "shorts". The soft bashing tactics that one employed when visiting here was noted upon arrival. I, for one, am glad not to have to read his crap anymore.
Here's hoping the good news we've been waiting on arrives next week. I think I'll have a piece of pumpkin pie for breakfast this morning. Or sweet potato pie...hmmm...why not have a small piece of each?
GO GAMECOCKS.....BEAT CLEMSON TOMORROW!!!