(Total Views: 244)
Posted On: 08/16/2017 9:54:30 AM
Post# of 41414
that was digestion exercise there.... that was.... I think if we are exactly in the same mind set - then we are continually excited about the future but increasingly frustrated with the lack of evidentiary progress and somewhat lost on how they intend to juggle all the balls in the air....all in dwindling company stated window.
I know that there are definitely posters who are showing some signs of exasperation. Cracks due to pressure that USGL has placed on themselves but felt by the fanbase. The silence is starting to permeate.
I am ok with the start on one plane and I agree with the capitalization on the 10 planes being 737 strategy you illustrate. I expect that the build approach is moving to a newer plane - which one may be driven by affordability. But even the 737 plan has challenges - pilots, stewards, ground, baggage, booking. It's all a relative build but you cannot lease a plane that has no one to fly it. More chicken and the egg stuff...
I like you mattress story - a blistering PR campaign - which costs money - is something I support. When I meant orgasmic I meant everything prior to the plan. Essentially the audits, name change etc. where the airline and mattress company derail is that what I said in the previous paragraph... all that explosive marketing and one plane... yet more chicken an the egg...
Of course all this comes at a cost which brings us back to audits and finance.... audits are truly the Baltia - The Roster so to speak (like that word play?)
I am sure that both you and I discussing this will bring a lot of opinions from others... on both boards. I think you and I are sort of calling the elephant in the room.... by name... and if they are listening, they may see that the pressure is building..... actually - let's just say anticipation
Last note on Siri - a nice walk down memory lane. The emphasis of my point was not to compare to USGL, but to emphasize the impact of positive cash flow... btw - remember when we were in SING? Seen that puppy lately?
I know that there are definitely posters who are showing some signs of exasperation. Cracks due to pressure that USGL has placed on themselves but felt by the fanbase. The silence is starting to permeate.
I am ok with the start on one plane and I agree with the capitalization on the 10 planes being 737 strategy you illustrate. I expect that the build approach is moving to a newer plane - which one may be driven by affordability. But even the 737 plan has challenges - pilots, stewards, ground, baggage, booking. It's all a relative build but you cannot lease a plane that has no one to fly it. More chicken and the egg stuff...
I like you mattress story - a blistering PR campaign - which costs money - is something I support. When I meant orgasmic I meant everything prior to the plan. Essentially the audits, name change etc. where the airline and mattress company derail is that what I said in the previous paragraph... all that explosive marketing and one plane... yet more chicken an the egg...
Of course all this comes at a cost which brings us back to audits and finance.... audits are truly the Baltia - The Roster so to speak (like that word play?)
I am sure that both you and I discussing this will bring a lot of opinions from others... on both boards. I think you and I are sort of calling the elephant in the room.... by name... and if they are listening, they may see that the pressure is building..... actually - let's just say anticipation
Last note on Siri - a nice walk down memory lane. The emphasis of my point was not to compare to USGL, but to emphasize the impact of positive cash flow... btw - remember when we were in SING? Seen that puppy lately?
(4)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
