(Total Views: 377)
Posted On: 03/31/2017 8:43:13 PM
Post# of 7795
Re: Coat Tail Rider #3271
Actually it's not hard to prove at all. All one has to do is read the permit issued before the Petrakis post and the SFRX PR. If you live in a state of DENIAL, then Kyle signed a document he FAILED to read.
Also, living in the state of DENIAL means Seafarers lacks a basic understanding of Florida statutes. Nothing in the statutes allows for "3 items" or verbal agreements. EVERYTHING has to be spelled out in the exploration permit. Surely you know this. If not I can for the 10000000000th time post the statutes.
I realize in order to carry Kyle's water one has to believe Kyle either forgot what he signed or didn't read what he signed and come up with the "verbal" conspiracy theory told both to Kyle and also Gregg Petrakis, who happens to be their star witness in which the Defendant was "alleged" to have sent Facebook private messages that Craig Huffman admitted he erroneously filed with the Court were Ihub posts. Poor Craig forget to check his notes before preparing his filing, but he wasn't trying to mislead the Court (winky winky).
The permit issued that Kyle Kennedy (apparently) forgot he signed, or didn't read.....
14. Issuance of this permit does not convey any rights to future permits.....
https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
The Craig Huffman, Oh I Forgot Filing.......
3. A review of the source of those matters made by Counsel on this day showed that the matters included were mislabeled by the undersigned Counsel as being from Investorshub, when they actually had been sent to counsel in July 2015 by the source of information, Gregory J. Petrakis. Mr. Petrakis had communicated to Counsel that such posts of messages to a third party by Volentine had actually been from Facebook sources. Counsel did not review the emails from Mr. Petrakis providing these matters to counsel when the Exhibit was prepared and filed later in 2015. Counsel mistakenly placed in the “Note” that the matters had been posted through Investorshub.
https://www.scribd.com/document/328138371/Not...rrection-1
What idiot mislabels an "alleged" Facebook private message that was NEVER verified as a PUBLIC Ihub post and files it with the Court?
Answer: Craig A. Huffman is that idiot. Here's the Exhibit.
https://www.scribd.com/document/328138007/Oct...D-Petrakis
But let's go to the state of DENIAL for a moment. Apparently you're the Governor of the State of Denial.
Maybe Kyle forgot what he signed when the permit was issued. The Judge said they have to prove the Defendant LIED. The Defendant said it was ONLY an exploration permit, which is true. Huffman filed they had complete transition to a recovery permit, which Mary smacked down..
Even if verbal, SFRX has to prove it, not the Defendant.
In other words, SFRX can't prove it's a LIE. And you can't prove there was a verbal agreement, because according to Florida statues such an agreement would be NULL and VOID and/or INVALID.
Let me know if you need to see the statutes...........AGAIN.
Glad to help.
Also, living in the state of DENIAL means Seafarers lacks a basic understanding of Florida statutes. Nothing in the statutes allows for "3 items" or verbal agreements. EVERYTHING has to be spelled out in the exploration permit. Surely you know this. If not I can for the 10000000000th time post the statutes.
Quote:
And if the "3 item" thing that was SO important was verbal... that's hard to prove either way.
I realize in order to carry Kyle's water one has to believe Kyle either forgot what he signed or didn't read what he signed and come up with the "verbal" conspiracy theory told both to Kyle and also Gregg Petrakis, who happens to be their star witness in which the Defendant was "alleged" to have sent Facebook private messages that Craig Huffman admitted he erroneously filed with the Court were Ihub posts. Poor Craig forget to check his notes before preparing his filing, but he wasn't trying to mislead the Court (winky winky).
The permit issued that Kyle Kennedy (apparently) forgot he signed, or didn't read.....
14. Issuance of this permit does not convey any rights to future permits.....
https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
The Craig Huffman, Oh I Forgot Filing.......
3. A review of the source of those matters made by Counsel on this day showed that the matters included were mislabeled by the undersigned Counsel as being from Investorshub, when they actually had been sent to counsel in July 2015 by the source of information, Gregory J. Petrakis. Mr. Petrakis had communicated to Counsel that such posts of messages to a third party by Volentine had actually been from Facebook sources. Counsel did not review the emails from Mr. Petrakis providing these matters to counsel when the Exhibit was prepared and filed later in 2015. Counsel mistakenly placed in the “Note” that the matters had been posted through Investorshub.
https://www.scribd.com/document/328138371/Not...rrection-1
What idiot mislabels an "alleged" Facebook private message that was NEVER verified as a PUBLIC Ihub post and files it with the Court?
Answer: Craig A. Huffman is that idiot. Here's the Exhibit.
https://www.scribd.com/document/328138007/Oct...D-Petrakis
But let's go to the state of DENIAL for a moment. Apparently you're the Governor of the State of Denial.
Maybe Kyle forgot what he signed when the permit was issued. The Judge said they have to prove the Defendant LIED. The Defendant said it was ONLY an exploration permit, which is true. Huffman filed they had complete transition to a recovery permit, which Mary smacked down..
Even if verbal, SFRX has to prove it, not the Defendant.
In other words, SFRX can't prove it's a LIE. And you can't prove there was a verbal agreement, because according to Florida statues such an agreement would be NULL and VOID and/or INVALID.
Let me know if you need to see the statutes...........AGAIN.
Glad to help.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
