(Total Views: 286)
Posted On: 03/14/2017 4:57:53 PM
Post# of 9144
Re: mitstevfel #3189
Sorry Mitz,
I hypothetically think you have serious stock non-performing issues.
Just my opinion.
And
No, I don't wish to see NNLX at .001 in order to buy it up.
And
I am implying nothing.
I am only stating that NNLX as a company does not own it's patents. The patents are owned by two individuals and as such could (I didn't say would) sell the patents to the highest bidder and leaving NNLX and it's shareholders out of the loop. DID YOU NOTICE I SAID COULD "NOT" WOULD? Maybe it WOULD be better if the patents were put into the company's name and pay BB and Dr. Faro a royalty?????
I hypothetically think you have serious stock non-performing issues.
Just my opinion.
And
No, I don't wish to see NNLX at .001 in order to buy it up.
And
I am implying nothing.
I am only stating that NNLX as a company does not own it's patents. The patents are owned by two individuals and as such could (I didn't say would) sell the patents to the highest bidder and leaving NNLX and it's shareholders out of the loop. DID YOU NOTICE I SAID COULD "NOT" WOULD? Maybe it WOULD be better if the patents were put into the company's name and pay BB and Dr. Faro a royalty?????
(4)
(0)
