Posted On: 09/17/2016 10:25:42 AM
Post# of 43066
ever notice how the trolls and sub tier interchangeable crew have to always
divert and deflect
what i posted was that the flagship doesn't need to be *operational* for P2O
to sell the founder's disruptive tech ..
only RH knows what path is being pursued in relation to NF coming back on line
or not
it doesn't need to be .. and imo *if* the blending site (clue) is leased .. imo NF
does come back on line .. but if the blending site is *sold* .. i see NF sold in due course as well
because P2O can set up agreements with *interested* parties .. clearly one
would be in NYS (gee who could that one be with ..
.. ) and obviously
there is multiple interest from *southern locations*
and as much fun as this is .. i have other events taking precedence today
digest both 2016 Shareholder Updates .. they are worth digesting nuances *imo*
4kids
divert and deflect
what i posted was that the flagship doesn't need to be *operational* for P2O
to sell the founder's disruptive tech ..
only RH knows what path is being pursued in relation to NF coming back on line
or not
it doesn't need to be .. and imo *if* the blending site (clue) is leased .. imo NF
does come back on line .. but if the blending site is *sold* .. i see NF sold in due course as well
because P2O can set up agreements with *interested* parties .. clearly one
would be in NYS (gee who could that one be with ..
.. ) and obviously there is multiple interest from *southern locations*
and as much fun as this is .. i have other events taking precedence today
digest both 2016 Shareholder Updates .. they are worth digesting nuances *imo*
4kids
(2)
(0)
