Posted On: 08/04/2016 9:44:25 AM
Post# of 41413
Re: choover8059 #27242
My thoughts have been that an agreement would consist of ownership, profit sharing, or some other alternative to shares.
Either way, I think a RS is necessary at some point. RSs are only bad when they're used as an an accounting smokescreen to make a company look much better than it actually is. When that's the case, the bottom falls out. However, when done for the right reasons, a RS can be very helpful.
If a RS has to been done to secure financing and a lease agreement, then so be it. Personally, I'd love to see a PR for a 100/1 RS IMMEDIATELY followed by a PR announcing a lease agreement and financing. The PPS won't dip much, if at all, when there's that much substance to the RS. If the aforementioned scenario played out, we'd be at $5-$10 at cert with a very reasonable OS. At that point, the sky's the limit!!
My point is this...a RS isn't always bad. If it is needed to secure financing, then great!!
Either way, I think a RS is necessary at some point. RSs are only bad when they're used as an an accounting smokescreen to make a company look much better than it actually is. When that's the case, the bottom falls out. However, when done for the right reasons, a RS can be very helpful.
If a RS has to been done to secure financing and a lease agreement, then so be it. Personally, I'd love to see a PR for a 100/1 RS IMMEDIATELY followed by a PR announcing a lease agreement and financing. The PPS won't dip much, if at all, when there's that much substance to the RS. If the aforementioned scenario played out, we'd be at $5-$10 at cert with a very reasonable OS. At that point, the sky's the limit!!
My point is this...a RS isn't always bad. If it is needed to secure financing, then great!!
(3)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
