Posted On: 06/10/2016 2:36:34 PM
Post# of 15187
Hey birdy! To an extent,your point is logical and may in fact be right.
But, there was a shareholder component to the law suit. It really depends on if they got additional money from PLN for the destruction of the stock.
Also, how much they got overall. If the total is a lot less than what we think, then you are right. The smart vending machines aren't cheap, as well as ingredients and supplies. Test marketing new products, advertising etc....will take up most of their money, no doubt.
The scenario I pointed out is one that could happen. it depends on the level they can get the pps to,needs to be relatively high, to protect shareholders of all levels.r/s
if they accelerate at a nice/crazy pace with revenues, where do you see the pps at?
Thunder
But, there was a shareholder component to the law suit. It really depends on if they got additional money from PLN for the destruction of the stock.
Also, how much they got overall. If the total is a lot less than what we think, then you are right. The smart vending machines aren't cheap, as well as ingredients and supplies. Test marketing new products, advertising etc....will take up most of their money, no doubt.
The scenario I pointed out is one that could happen. it depends on the level they can get the pps to,needs to be relatively high, to protect shareholders of all levels.r/s
if they accelerate at a nice/crazy pace with revenues, where do you see the pps at?
Thunder
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
