Posted On: 06/10/2016 10:34:40 AM
Post# of 72443
I posted this in response to the SA article; I doubt it will be published.
Nice summary. I also question the intentions of this site on allowing the Mako article to be published in the first place. Why was no due diligence required on their part? Also, is their no 3 day waiting period any longer on submitted articles to SA?
Nice summary. I also question the intentions of this site on allowing the Mako article to be published in the first place. Why was no due diligence required on their part? Also, is their no 3 day waiting period any longer on submitted articles to SA?
(2)
(0)
Lord, help me to be the person that my dogs think I am...
Scroll down for more posts ▼
