Quote:

---

Yes, the 44 minutes are a clear example of intellect...
NON BIASED INTELLECT

---

So you claim. I did not watch the entire video, so indulge me.

Did the speaker mention that this allegedly biased judge granted the defendant's motion to move the trial to a date after the election?

(Later in Nov., as it turns out.)

True bias, not to mention animus toward Trump, would have that trial underway no later than Oct. That way Trump could dance between the debates and testifying in the trial!

Not happening. Could've, but it isn't.

Did the video guy throw up the quotes from Republicans condemning Trumps remarks? There has been a sh*t load of 'em, right?
All of 'em wrong?

Are YOU under the impression that the charges against Trump U. are without merit, despite findings to the contrary by an appeals court?

Finally, was this the first time that Trumps has slammed an ethnic group, the first time his remarks have drawn fire from Republicans?

The prosecution rests!