Posted On: 06/09/2016 12:26:11 AM
Post# of 72443
More nonsense on lieHUB. CTIX did not ask for a change of venue. CTIX asked for the case to be dismissed because they though NY was not the proper venue for the case to be filed.
IMO, not being a lawyer, the judge was correct to say that the Rosen Firm could file in NY, since the OTC and various financial markets have their headquarters in NY. I always thought that was kind of a "throw it on the wall and see if it sticks" move by our lawyers, and it was trivial.
But KarinCA is absolutely wrong when she says that CTIX asked for a change of venue. They categorically did NOT. They asked for dismissal on the basis of improper venue.
Perhaps someone who posts on lieHUB can correct the record over there.
IMO, not being a lawyer, the judge was correct to say that the Rosen Firm could file in NY, since the OTC and various financial markets have their headquarters in NY. I always thought that was kind of a "throw it on the wall and see if it sticks" move by our lawyers, and it was trivial.
But KarinCA is absolutely wrong when she says that CTIX asked for a change of venue. They categorically did NOT. They asked for dismissal on the basis of improper venue.
Perhaps someone who posts on lieHUB can correct the record over there.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
