Posted On: 05/12/2016 5:52:45 PM
Post# of 65629
Quote:
Yes it does. It's a corrupt sample given the agenda. It becomes easily skewed to fit a given agenda. You can not trust it...look at this eample:
Nope, your 'example' has nothing to do with the info in the article I posted. Take apart THOSE numbers, if you can.
I'm really not certain that even you can pretend that a combo of tax cuts, 'off the books' war costs and unfunded Medicare D have NOT contributed enormously to long term debt. Those are real costs and there are real numbers to measure them.
They were in that article and there were numerous citations to back up their arguments.
Is there actually an 'agenda' that credibly argues the opposite?
Stop calling 'agenda' every time information conflicts with your beliefs, and deal with the actual information in front of you.
When I and other are confronted with Fox News errors of omission and of commission, we don't throw up our hands and exclaim 'bias'!
We fact-check, refute and only then exclaim.............'biased agenda'!
'Show me your work'.
LOL!
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
