Posted On: 02/11/2016 11:11:49 AM
Post# of 96892
I disagree.
In order to be prepared for future audited financials, anything they put on paper now has to be just a correct.
I am guessing it's more a matter of paying for audits to be done more than anything else.
There are more pressing financial matters to deal with. I'm fine with un-audited financials until they are ready to make an major move to another market.
Revenue means everything. You cant pay for things if you don't have money and are self-sustaining audited financials or not. The bills are real and you need real money to pay for them.
If the eventually do a share buy back there should not be a need for an RS
In order to be prepared for future audited financials, anything they put on paper now has to be just a correct.
I am guessing it's more a matter of paying for audits to be done more than anything else.
There are more pressing financial matters to deal with. I'm fine with un-audited financials until they are ready to make an major move to another market.
Revenue means everything. You cant pay for things if you don't have money and are self-sustaining audited financials or not. The bills are real and you need real money to pay for them.
If the eventually do a share buy back there should not be a need for an RS
(0)
(0)
