Posted On: 01/21/2016 6:46:13 PM
Post# of 72443
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Could it be that this "falsity requirement" will come into play with Rosen's second amended complaint?
From the article...
From the article...
Quote:
Courts also use the falsity requirement to reject so-called “puzzle pleadings”—pleadings in which defendants provide lengthy block quotes from various public reports and, instead of specifically stating why each statement is false, summarize the numerous reasons why all of the statements allegedly are false. E.g., Mauss v. NuVasive, Inc., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2014) (collecting cases)
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
Scroll down for more posts ▼