Posted On: 12/01/2015 8:23:39 PM
Post# of 72440
So, I'm sitting here trying to reason with the end of the hurricane season and am about to think out loud for a moment, bear with me.
We "know" that there is no naked shorting going on because #1 it's illegal and #2 the bash brigade tells us that there is no naked short interest. They are same ones that squeal the loudest when AlanC's daily numbers are posted. If, and this is only IF this practice is real, why would they not take the recent dip in prices to cover their asses and pickup the shares they need to avoid a catastrophic loss? The obvious answer is that they don't intend to cover as Alan allows. Their goal is to bankrupt the company so they have no cost associated with the scheme because they only borrowed the shares. If the company goes bust, they're swimming in gravy.
If, on the other hand, this doesn't exist at all, as some would have us believe, and the only shorting done is legal shorting, then why again, would they not have already covered at the recent lows? Who in their right mind would risk unlimited loss potential? There's some pretty sharp operators who post here and that other site. I don't think any of them would risk that kind of loss with the imminent success that Cellceutix is poised to achieve.
That leads me back to the rabbit hole again. There is only one answer as to why our share price is at these levels with the news we've been handed lately. This naked shorting scheme is as real as the noses on our faces, and it's pretty obvious who is behind it, at least the mouthpiece behind it.
Y'all are free to make your own conclusions; I have made mine.
thoughts anyone???
We "know" that there is no naked shorting going on because #1 it's illegal and #2 the bash brigade tells us that there is no naked short interest. They are same ones that squeal the loudest when AlanC's daily numbers are posted. If, and this is only IF this practice is real, why would they not take the recent dip in prices to cover their asses and pickup the shares they need to avoid a catastrophic loss? The obvious answer is that they don't intend to cover as Alan allows. Their goal is to bankrupt the company so they have no cost associated with the scheme because they only borrowed the shares. If the company goes bust, they're swimming in gravy.
If, on the other hand, this doesn't exist at all, as some would have us believe, and the only shorting done is legal shorting, then why again, would they not have already covered at the recent lows? Who in their right mind would risk unlimited loss potential? There's some pretty sharp operators who post here and that other site. I don't think any of them would risk that kind of loss with the imminent success that Cellceutix is poised to achieve.
That leads me back to the rabbit hole again. There is only one answer as to why our share price is at these levels with the news we've been handed lately. This naked shorting scheme is as real as the noses on our faces, and it's pretty obvious who is behind it, at least the mouthpiece behind it.
Y'all are free to make your own conclusions; I have made mine.
thoughts anyone???
(0)
(0)
Lord, help me to be the person that my dogs think I am...
Scroll down for more posts ▼
