You're right. The problem needs to be fixed at the source. If the negative arguments are flawed and contain BS as in the form of incorrect references to PRs, promises that never occurred,complaints about numbers with NO specific references or detailed analysis explaining HOW it's so terrible and they're posted publicly on this board, then those flawed arguments need to be challenged right here in public. If people get sick of it to the point of puking, they need to take measures to stop it at the source. I think we all know that Crawford is the source.