It may be a little passive, but it's innocent enough. The revenues, along with growing public acceptance of hemp containing foods and meds (helped by the government getting their heads out), will allow them to grow the company in size and financial strength faster than without the design alterative. They will both be aggressively marketed at the same time and, like MadBeez distributors said, they will constantly be trying to phase in the leaf cans along side the snowflake cans with the intent to revert back to all leaf cans in as many locations as possible. As that strategy is pursued, they will of course have to pay close attention to sales of both designs in those locations in order to track changes in sales trends. There are some areas where we haven't even scraped the surface yet (like India, where qualification testing is under way) that have huge sales potential and are more likely to overwhelmingly embrace the leaf design. We can thank cronyism and paid for politicians in Washington for even requiring the move, but the struggle itself may prove to be a huge benefit to us. Especially everywhere that we are successful in stocking shelves with the leaf design, so I'm agreeing with you 100% on the importance of brand building. However, revenue equals strength by debt elimination, growth, the ability to take on the competition and the ability to absorb financial hits due to sneaky maneuvers by competitors intended to hurt your bottom line. In time hopefully all of the cans will sport the leaf.