Posted On: 08/28/2015 12:43:40 PM
Post# of 11038
![](/m/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Re: CASH-IS-K1N6 #499
What it really boils down to is the special 25% rule which basically states all shares prior to ex-date are entitled to the div. Everything else is pretty much noise. Shorts will be liable for the shares they didn't cover and CRGP will be liable for anything else up to the OS on 8/18 (they were smart enough to buy back so their extent of liability should be OS as of ex-date).
If on the other hand, COR was not short, CRGP would need to pay back funds in excess to what they provided to DTCC but only up to the OS at the EOD on 8/18.
If on the other hand, COR was not short, CRGP would need to pay back funds in excess to what they provided to DTCC but only up to the OS at the EOD on 8/18.
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)
PLEASE READ IF YOU READ MY POSTS
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
I invested in Calissio Resources Group because I considered the financial statements warranted an investment. For every reader here that has been paying attention to my posts, please note the following:
1) I am not licensed to give investment advice. Everything expressed here is an opinion of my own for discussion purposes.
2) The only thing I know about the upcoming merger is that typically they are good for investors. A premium is typically offered when companies go private from what I understand. I certainly was and still am an investor before this announcement was made.
3) Finally, regarding the current OS, while there is lots of conjecture, I must rely on the only available information out there which has been presented in PRs. Therefore, OS as of the last PR was 242m. Consequently, I don't believe there is reason to believe I am a majority holder, despite recent purchases, without making a large degree of assumptions.
If anyone is wondering why I am posting this, it is because I want to make sure no one misinterprets my posts or considers I have any intent on the board other than to share potential ideas/speculate on possibilities.
Scroll down for more posts ▼