Posted On: 06/13/2015 5:21:21 PM
Post# of 43066
Re: AsaCandler #20239
if you are a regular reader of the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation
you'd recognize that 99% stat (i note) which the CON side of the various crews'
trot out by rote
has anyone besides Robert Shapiro (no relation to former *project* SEC Chair Mary Schapiro) who worked within Clinton's admin ever tried to calculate how many
OTC co.s have been killed off and at what cost?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_J._Shapiro
highly doubtful
reminder it was just a few years back that the *first* hit piece *author* on P2O
trotted out pithy posts almost daily that there was no such thing as *shorting*
of OTC stox
shucks .. even the dolts' actions had to prove that lie for what it was
again *my* CEs' are basic
OTC is poorly watched and heavily manipulated
i've made a point (as long i'm an investor) of making sure that at least *poorly* watched
doesn't apply to any OTC stock i'm in
that doesn't provide a guarantee ( that ) there is no risk
but it goes a long way *for me where my money is concerned*
btw .. specific to *FILTH* being on their knees
since RH was installed as Ceo .. (mid August 2013)
that would be last Fall >> and gee we all know what came to pass
in October 2014 with *volume* that rivaled back to back of Jan 4/5 2012
and currently ..
which is why it's gonna be telling to see what *route* comes to pass re: P2O's next material event filed
and how *handled*
btw .. what imo used to be the sole province of the OTC .. has since morphed
to exchange traded stox .. which is why i keep noting if one can understand
cycle of money patterns noted on OTC stox via *retails' access to l2* .. then
it's like taking candy from a baby .. re: the big boards .. all one has to know
is which part of the cycle is in play
and just an aside ... it will be telling to see exactly when the dolts (SEC)
wind up *re-grandfathering FTDs* .. personally i don't see them doing that
*again* without electronically tagging all pubco stox .. but the dance of the
algos' specific to exchange traded stox .. is getting ever more *obvious* to *retail*
imo of course
4kids
you'd recognize that 99% stat (i note) which the CON side of the various crews'
trot out by rote
has anyone besides Robert Shapiro (no relation to former *project* SEC Chair Mary Schapiro) who worked within Clinton's admin ever tried to calculate how many
OTC co.s have been killed off and at what cost?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_J._Shapiro
highly doubtful
reminder it was just a few years back that the *first* hit piece *author* on P2O
trotted out pithy posts almost daily that there was no such thing as *shorting*
of OTC stox
shucks .. even the dolts' actions had to prove that lie for what it was
again *my* CEs' are basic
OTC is poorly watched and heavily manipulated
i've made a point (as long i'm an investor) of making sure that at least *poorly* watched
doesn't apply to any OTC stock i'm in
that doesn't provide a guarantee ( that ) there is no risk
but it goes a long way *for me where my money is concerned*
btw .. specific to *FILTH* being on their knees
since RH was installed as Ceo .. (mid August 2013)
that would be last Fall >> and gee we all know what came to pass
in October 2014 with *volume* that rivaled back to back of Jan 4/5 2012
and currently ..
which is why it's gonna be telling to see what *route* comes to pass re: P2O's next material event filed
and how *handled*
btw .. what imo used to be the sole province of the OTC .. has since morphed
to exchange traded stox .. which is why i keep noting if one can understand
cycle of money patterns noted on OTC stox via *retails' access to l2* .. then
it's like taking candy from a baby .. re: the big boards .. all one has to know
is which part of the cycle is in play
and just an aside ... it will be telling to see exactly when the dolts (SEC)
wind up *re-grandfathering FTDs* .. personally i don't see them doing that
*again* without electronically tagging all pubco stox .. but the dance of the
algos' specific to exchange traded stox .. is getting ever more *obvious* to *retail*
imo of course
4kids
(0)
(0)
