Posted On: 02/28/2015 12:47:17 PM
Post# of 43065

Re: PaperProphet #18034
There's an absurdity to this question. It should really be flipped on its head: How much more fraud does the company have to inflict on investors before the down-99% bagholders accept that it's a scam?
How many more tens of millions would need to be lost?
How many more dozens of announced deals and join ventures need to vanish without a single word ever mentioned by management?
How many more actions for securities crimes by regulatory agencies need to be launched?
How many more times does management need to be banned from being an officer or director?
How many more admissions to fraud and securities crimes does a founder have to make?
How many more times does management have to withhold material information about processors being broken, while putting out fraudlent PRs saying they've been fixed, purposely misleading investors?
How many more tens of millions would need to be lost?
How many more dozens of announced deals and join ventures need to vanish without a single word ever mentioned by management?
How many more actions for securities crimes by regulatory agencies need to be launched?
How many more times does management need to be banned from being an officer or director?
How many more admissions to fraud and securities crimes does a founder have to make?
How many more times does management have to withhold material information about processors being broken, while putting out fraudlent PRs saying they've been fixed, purposely misleading investors?


Scroll down for more posts ▼