again each person has to make those determinations for themselves

since you track others' posts so assiduously .. track those that note *realistic*
time frames

what is a realistic time frame?

it will be different for each *investor* or *trader* based on their own *education and awareness*

then factor in *efforts* in aggregate working against X investment

doesn't matter these days if it's big board or OTC >> rot is endemic
courtesy of the paper tiger known as the sec aka dolts

i'm in the camp that does believe in DCA'ing shares if events warrant

i actually understood what RH's install as ceo in mid August 2013 meant
to say nothing of what his infusion of cash on 9.30.13 >> meant

i understood what the material events filed in 2014 >> meant

i'm reminded of when i listen to *big board* co.s (earnings' CC/s) of just how long
*it takes re: realistic time frames*

i will repeat .. the evolution of P2O's prox from table top to flagship >> is stunning

imo that window (2009-2013) .. will be cut in half for P2O's *transition* (2014-2015)

and there are 2 outcomes for (gasp) actual P2O investors

buyout or uplisting

all the rest is *noise* .. but have at it ..

because no one is selling .. and the only way any colluding entity is gonna get *sells*

is either by *running* PPS (pre material events)

or *raiding* PPS (and that time frame is a very short window en route >>> pun intended)

4kids