Posted On: 12/23/2014 9:20:31 AM
Post# of 17653
Slic, let me clarify for you that when I said:
Insider trading is for the SEC to determine so we'll not go there
"Insider trading is for the SEC to determine so we'll not go there"
I meant that the issue of insider trading was not for us to discuss.
Secondly, you're deciding to share information from your discussions with Garry is your prerogative. I've ALWAYS made it clear how I've felt about it and have not changed my opinion on this.
The most important and often missed point of this issue when I address it is that it would always be better for Garry to share it directly than through a confidante. Or at least address the fact that he has discovered that he is not able to share "fluid updates" as he previously stated.
It's simple accountability on his part. IMHO.
Insider trading is for the SEC to determine so we'll not go there
"Insider trading is for the SEC to determine so we'll not go there"
I meant that the issue of insider trading was not for us to discuss.
Secondly, you're deciding to share information from your discussions with Garry is your prerogative. I've ALWAYS made it clear how I've felt about it and have not changed my opinion on this.
The most important and often missed point of this issue when I address it is that it would always be better for Garry to share it directly than through a confidante. Or at least address the fact that he has discovered that he is not able to share "fluid updates" as he previously stated.
It's simple accountability on his part. IMHO.
(0)
(0)
