Posted On: 11/24/2014 3:58:10 PM
Post# of 30033
Also seems like this presents a drug that will create MANF-like ER stress protections...but along with other side-effects and system interactions.
Seems like if you need >B to protect C..... than rather than popping A to create >B, thus protecting C....it would be easier to just introduce>B in the first place and with no additional side effects to be concerned about. No?
Seems like if you need >B to protect C..... than rather than popping A to create >B, thus protecting C....it would be easier to just introduce>B in the first place and with no additional side effects to be concerned about. No?
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼