Posted On: 10/28/2014 5:35:33 PM
Post# of 43066
i'll let you in on a little secret
if you can understand how the PROs work the OTC
it makes stox on the big board a piece of cake to *decipher* patterns
here are 2 recent buys (FEYE via IPO then sold on take UP)
FEYE (re-bought @ sub 26.00 for next round of the money cycle)
and
EVOL (added to core holding @ sub 9.00 for cash div)
2 stox that fixated trolls seem to have *missed* >> er my interest
and noted contemporaneously by moi @ their IPO and post IPO
ANET and GPRO
would you like to know what CCs i'm listening to over the next 3 weeks
the fact than any *legit* retail would disregard stock manipulation out of those
who can *CONtroll* outcomes >> based on what the dolts themselves
have revealed in the last 2 years .. defies my logic and common sense
unless of course they are inherently stupid >> or bought and paid for
that said
what others do (including yourself *wang*) is their issue .. it's their money
if it's even *invested* in P2O via PTOI
i do have my doubts re: some
i also find it beyond revealing that those who seemingly *complain* the most
do the least amount of DD >> to say nothing of being cognizant of their respective risk tolerance
or basic business practices ..
i had a conversation with another P2O investor earlier today .. and we were discussing *contracts* and legal counsel for all parties' interests (separate co.)
it took 8 months (to finalize) back and forth .. mere paragraphs in dispute
can you imagine a newly emerging tech and sector .. hmmmm
that is the real world .. and why it's pretty easy to tell who *operates* in the real world
vs the fakes >> who pretend via SMBs >> they have any awareness of anything .. yet *magically* are *experts* re: every sector ..
it was one of the first *clues* of how the PROs' work SMBs ..
i've actually worked in start up funded by a *global* corporation
i'm familiar with start ups transitioning to IPO status
and i'm very familiar with successful early adopters albeit in a totally different sector and from a different time re: *dolts* and reg sho (circa 1998-2000)
i'm also au fait with the analyst community .. which is why i strongly suggested all with interest in P2O >> listen to the tnen CCs' held via KiOR
because imo there will be overlap amongst some of those analysts with P2O
in due course
===
the amount of money in play @ the almost 5 year window (against) P2O is staggering
PROs' never cover one second b4 being forced to do so
what is intriguing to me after doing the last round of tapes ..
is the lack of traction 2M+ >> got PTOI
which makes me ask out loud .. so which aromatic loaned a cert out?
do you think that is ? the ceo could answer?
and what exactly is the intent of that aromatic
P2O's tech taken for pennies on the $
so that it could be *reworked* and then IPO'd in 2 years
(underwriters pricing @ 25.00)
and that imo is just one *layer* of deceit in play
as i've noted a few times >> i need a new white board respective to *colluding entities* and P2O
4kids
if you can understand how the PROs work the OTC
it makes stox on the big board a piece of cake to *decipher* patterns
here are 2 recent buys (FEYE via IPO then sold on take UP)
FEYE (re-bought @ sub 26.00 for next round of the money cycle)
and
EVOL (added to core holding @ sub 9.00 for cash div)
2 stox that fixated trolls seem to have *missed* >> er my interest
and noted contemporaneously by moi @ their IPO and post IPO
ANET and GPRO
would you like to know what CCs i'm listening to over the next 3 weeks
the fact than any *legit* retail would disregard stock manipulation out of those
who can *CONtroll* outcomes >> based on what the dolts themselves
have revealed in the last 2 years .. defies my logic and common sense
unless of course they are inherently stupid >> or bought and paid for
that said
what others do (including yourself *wang*) is their issue .. it's their money
if it's even *invested* in P2O via PTOI
i do have my doubts re: some
i also find it beyond revealing that those who seemingly *complain* the most
do the least amount of DD >> to say nothing of being cognizant of their respective risk tolerance
or basic business practices ..
i had a conversation with another P2O investor earlier today .. and we were discussing *contracts* and legal counsel for all parties' interests (separate co.)
it took 8 months (to finalize) back and forth .. mere paragraphs in dispute
can you imagine a newly emerging tech and sector .. hmmmm
that is the real world .. and why it's pretty easy to tell who *operates* in the real world
vs the fakes >> who pretend via SMBs >> they have any awareness of anything .. yet *magically* are *experts* re: every sector ..
it was one of the first *clues* of how the PROs' work SMBs ..
i've actually worked in start up funded by a *global* corporation
i'm familiar with start ups transitioning to IPO status
and i'm very familiar with successful early adopters albeit in a totally different sector and from a different time re: *dolts* and reg sho (circa 1998-2000)
i'm also au fait with the analyst community .. which is why i strongly suggested all with interest in P2O >> listen to the tnen CCs' held via KiOR
because imo there will be overlap amongst some of those analysts with P2O
in due course
===
the amount of money in play @ the almost 5 year window (against) P2O is staggering
PROs' never cover one second b4 being forced to do so
what is intriguing to me after doing the last round of tapes ..
is the lack of traction 2M+ >> got PTOI
which makes me ask out loud .. so which aromatic loaned a cert out?
do you think that is ? the ceo could answer?
and what exactly is the intent of that aromatic
P2O's tech taken for pennies on the $
so that it could be *reworked* and then IPO'd in 2 years
(underwriters pricing @ 25.00)
and that imo is just one *layer* of deceit in play
as i've noted a few times >> i need a new white board respective to *colluding entities* and P2O
4kids
(0)
(0)
