You ARE GOOD at twisting words...

liars like you USUALLY ARE!

Nothing in your post represents what I said!

You said there was no evidence that feedstock had been tested...

clearly the Crayola scrap IS TESTED feedstock.

I am sure that there are more feedstocks that were tested as well...

scrap car parts that were converted to fuel...

ag waste converted to fuel.


That does not mean that Crayola is a potential buyer at this time... nor does it rule out a buyer who could process Crayola waste as well as other waste streams!

You TROLLS are so predictable... distortion of remarks and then twisting to the negative agenda.

I'm so glad that the first sale of a prox will BURN all TROLL A-Hs and their employers! lol