Posted On: 10/22/2014 5:22:32 PM
Post# of 43066
So it is your contention the 'buyers' feedstock that is being touted as tested in late 2013 was Crayola ?
Since the machines already had been processing Crayola feedstock for months prior to that what was the point of any kind of 'test' ?
And since it was already known they could handle Crayola castoffs why has it been nearly 15 months since Heddle announced they were selling machines and Crayola ( who wouldn't need a machine designed for them -see above ) still hasn't bought one ?
And why use an engineering firm to locate clients if Crayola is the mythical buyer who had its feedstock supposedly tested in 2013?
Like shooting fish in a barrel.....and still not one bit of verification any mythical buyers feedstock was ever tested.
Since the machines already had been processing Crayola feedstock for months prior to that what was the point of any kind of 'test' ?
And since it was already known they could handle Crayola castoffs why has it been nearly 15 months since Heddle announced they were selling machines and Crayola ( who wouldn't need a machine designed for them -see above ) still hasn't bought one ?
And why use an engineering firm to locate clients if Crayola is the mythical buyer who had its feedstock supposedly tested in 2013?
Like shooting fish in a barrel.....and still not one bit of verification any mythical buyers feedstock was ever tested.
(0)
(0)
