Posted On: 10/09/2014 1:35:15 PM
Post# of 39368
DCB I tried to post a reply to you comment on the other board but it was removed. So, here (where there is no censorship for expressing a positive opinion) it is;
Mack has no intent is to negotiate with Treaty, which is evident with the Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition, where he attempted to put Treaty out of business and leave its shareholders (you and me) with nothing. Why should Treaty or its shareholders negotiate with someone who clearly has no judgment against Treaty?
Mack has the option of participating in Treaty's future drilling ventures by purchasing shares if he so desires. Or, if you are felling generous, when our stock pps takes off perhaps you can donate to that very unworthy cause from your own profits.
Mack has no intent is to negotiate with Treaty, which is evident with the Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition, where he attempted to put Treaty out of business and leave its shareholders (you and me) with nothing. Why should Treaty or its shareholders negotiate with someone who clearly has no judgment against Treaty?
Mack has the option of participating in Treaty's future drilling ventures by purchasing shares if he so desires. Or, if you are felling generous, when our stock pps takes off perhaps you can donate to that very unworthy cause from your own profits.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
