Posted On: 09/28/2014 1:29:25 PM
Post# of 96900
thoughtful issuances designed to increase market share and shareholder value are telltale. either a shareholder sees them as ntek bringing in more business (and therefore warranted and welcome) or they do not
could anyone argue that recent hiring's (blake brown, carl bellitti, and consultants) and partnerships haven't improved shareholder value? (sony, vizio, best buy,)
as an investor that's all i can ask for
the phrase, "it takes money to make money" may be in play. ntek using equity to capitalize business opportunities is wise. everyone involved now has a vested interest. better than money (which does not tend to appreciate in value as shares can)
also, we can be fairly certain that if our partners hated the idea, thought it a scam or worse (products without purpose or promise), they wouldn't have accepted shares. they would have demanded cash only. that you can be certain of. since while shares can appreciate in value (unlike cash), they can depreciate too. especially over a year period
none of these new hires, partners, and companies would do a deal in this form (or fashion) if this wasn't the real deal. no reason to. these new hires and partnering companies are buying into the business model. and they're doing it for a financial stake in the success of the company, products, and future - just like we (shareholders) are
(edit. pm reply to inquiries. yes. feel free to use this post. copy and paste to whatever other fb, ihub, stock relay, yahoo, google, silicon, et. al. forums, social and message boards - as well as debate the pov with me if you disagree. just stay on topic and focused on the stock, company, management, business and investor relevant issues)
could anyone argue that recent hiring's (blake brown, carl bellitti, and consultants) and partnerships haven't improved shareholder value? (sony, vizio, best buy,)
as an investor that's all i can ask for
the phrase, "it takes money to make money" may be in play. ntek using equity to capitalize business opportunities is wise. everyone involved now has a vested interest. better than money (which does not tend to appreciate in value as shares can)
also, we can be fairly certain that if our partners hated the idea, thought it a scam or worse (products without purpose or promise), they wouldn't have accepted shares. they would have demanded cash only. that you can be certain of. since while shares can appreciate in value (unlike cash), they can depreciate too. especially over a year period
none of these new hires, partners, and companies would do a deal in this form (or fashion) if this wasn't the real deal. no reason to. these new hires and partnering companies are buying into the business model. and they're doing it for a financial stake in the success of the company, products, and future - just like we (shareholders) are
(edit. pm reply to inquiries. yes. feel free to use this post. copy and paste to whatever other fb, ihub, stock relay, yahoo, google, silicon, et. al. forums, social and message boards - as well as debate the pov with me if you disagree. just stay on topic and focused on the stock, company, management, business and investor relevant issues)
(0)
(0)
