Anything is possible. But watson's story doesn't add up for me. Why does it matter? Well, flippers prosper off of our stock going sky high and then coming back down....time and time again. When someone claims to have "info from the inside" as watson claims repeatedly and makes massive predictions that don't come true, and then doesn't meet with me at Conferences he says he attended, and even saw me at....it just doesn't add up.

I think Fibonacci has also been proven to be nothing more than a speculator...and not a very good one at that.

I think it matters if the person posting positive speculations about the company is real or not. I think one's motives count. Everyone knows me, I'm an open book. I've had pictures of my wife and I taken with Gerald in Vegas just so people would know I am real. Everyone knows I am long and believes me. I may not be right, but I'm not trying to pump the stock artificially so I can dump it, which is what clever flippers are all about.

Are Watson & Fibonacci dramatic aliases used by clever flippers to artificially pump the stock? Was Bigbang an alias, who predicted our pps would be at $15 per share by now because of "blockbuster data Gerald was sitting on?" Like watson, he always used the phrase: "As per my sources..." Then he left the mb on a sabbatical to Tasmania! LOL!

I think most of what goes on at the Yahoo mb is pretend. I indicated yesterday that I will no longer post there, and I intend to keep that promise. Rather than watch people make monkeys out of themselves, I'd rather just go to the zoo.