Posted On: 08/29/2014 1:45:17 PM
Post# of 8059
of course they are recycling the same stuff refuted many times before,including llc's closed out because superceded by a new entity etc,
all PR's back then said no shares issued since 2010, Bob had majority control and sold his shares to Brad,as per may 2013 pr
the suits mentioned by PR were re port holding cwrn ore -
CWRN won that suit and re something illegal geo had done,which geo will have to answer for,which cwrn would win
due to port holding cwrn ore cwrn planned on selling byproduct but contested mex july 2012 elections and lameduck govt stopped that-combined w geo allegedly withholding millions from the shipments
but cwrn won tx case and CA court has been saying geo is in default in CA
maybe the unlawful without due process dtc siege is about to be lifted-why else would they rehash all that old nonsense
all PR's back then said no shares issued since 2010, Bob had majority control and sold his shares to Brad,as per may 2013 pr
the suits mentioned by PR were re port holding cwrn ore -
CWRN won that suit and re something illegal geo had done,which geo will have to answer for,which cwrn would win
due to port holding cwrn ore cwrn planned on selling byproduct but contested mex july 2012 elections and lameduck govt stopped that-combined w geo allegedly withholding millions from the shipments
but cwrn won tx case and CA court has been saying geo is in default in CA
maybe the unlawful without due process dtc siege is about to be lifted-why else would they rehash all that old nonsense
(0)
(0)
