Posted On: 08/03/2014 10:20:22 AM
Post# of 43066
Re: techisbest #11700
fascinating
?
have you ever worked for a start up?
if you have you know the risk initially far outweighs the reward
i've posted about this previously
pennies on the $ (pay scale) with *stock* being primary compensation
and benefits sub par with industry sector
the goal of course was after 5 to 10 years >> an IPO would ensue
allowing a portion of those shares allocated as payment to be sold
upon a successful debut
in the old days (2 decades ago) when access to capital and
manipulation were handled *differently* .. an employee who
was in the top 10% of the start ups' hires >> could expect to
retire upon the successful IPO .. if so inclined .. based on 2 aspects
total aggregate of shares paid in compensation .. and just how well
the foundation (leverage) had been laid over the prior 5 to 10 years
specific to emerging (disruptive) technology
no one with functioning gray matter expects *seamless* out of start up
the expectation that anyone would have (including the founder) in 2008 or 2009 >> that every aspect articulated *then* >> would remain the same
is literally foolish and reveals a basic lack of overall *awareness*
i don't enjoy pointing out certain retails' lack of *awareness* (ie sophistication)
i also can empathize and sympathize (check dictionary for specifics)
with an exhausted retail
but what boggles my mind >> is why anyone who believes what you have posted
is still an investor
anyone who believes that the events of the last 4 years (July 2010 to today) re: first hit piece/CSTI imported/dolt's letter (9.28.14)/WN set up/
dolt's complaint/aromatics/threshold re dux/sabotage/settlement/depo gate and the last and most telling of all >> the wicked gamble undertaken
re: pps manipulation undertaken >> HAS HAD NO IMPACT ON P2O
can't be helped
4kids
?
have you ever worked for a start up?
if you have you know the risk initially far outweighs the reward
i've posted about this previously
pennies on the $ (pay scale) with *stock* being primary compensation
and benefits sub par with industry sector
the goal of course was after 5 to 10 years >> an IPO would ensue
allowing a portion of those shares allocated as payment to be sold
upon a successful debut
in the old days (2 decades ago) when access to capital and
manipulation were handled *differently* .. an employee who
was in the top 10% of the start ups' hires >> could expect to
retire upon the successful IPO .. if so inclined .. based on 2 aspects
total aggregate of shares paid in compensation .. and just how well
the foundation (leverage) had been laid over the prior 5 to 10 years
specific to emerging (disruptive) technology
no one with functioning gray matter expects *seamless* out of start up
the expectation that anyone would have (including the founder) in 2008 or 2009 >> that every aspect articulated *then* >> would remain the same
is literally foolish and reveals a basic lack of overall *awareness*
i don't enjoy pointing out certain retails' lack of *awareness* (ie sophistication)
i also can empathize and sympathize (check dictionary for specifics)
with an exhausted retail
but what boggles my mind >> is why anyone who believes what you have posted
is still an investor
anyone who believes that the events of the last 4 years (July 2010 to today) re: first hit piece/CSTI imported/dolt's letter (9.28.14)/WN set up/
dolt's complaint/aromatics/threshold re dux/sabotage/settlement/depo gate and the last and most telling of all >> the wicked gamble undertaken
re: pps manipulation undertaken >> HAS HAD NO IMPACT ON P2O
can't be helped
4kids
(0)
(0)
