where were the "listed items" (Revenue, revenue streams, and audited financials.) when the pps was trading over a double from here? for months!?










to suggest one can explain what will happen when with stocks is just silly. and in this case, it's an unsubstantiated view at best. why? past performance does not correlate. does not support the price-action views you postulate.

ergo, faulty premise.









the price was higher by over 200%. a double from here that was more sustained than not. and, as i said, the company/stock has proven things it had not at that time.

if it happened before, it can happen again. saying it could not and needs only this or that is inaccurate (simply by virtue of it having happened b4)








we can agree to disagree and leave it at that.