Posted On: 06/14/2014 1:16:04 AM
Post# of 30036
It was demanded that I post an apology here to avoid a lawsuit. I posted it last night, and then the very person who demanded I post the public apology quickly demanded the moderators remove it. I guess it didn't meet the demand requirements. Tanis saw it, and thought it was well written.
I swear, I can't figure this guy out. First he tells me he's not going to contact me any further, then I continue to get a dozen or more messages from him. He tells me he will not accept an apology, and 3 hours later makes demands for a public apology. I make the apology, and then he demands it be removed.
Seems like disorganized thinking. I think I remember seeing that term used several times in several court documents. Could it be related?
One thing I clearly noted in my apology was that I was wrong calling joboggi a quack. He also took offense to the term "duck", but I cannot comment on that because I never called him a duck, I only posted an image of a duck. I've never seen his pic, so I don't know if he looks like a duck or not. Because he was offended over the use of a duck, there is possibly some resemblance, but that is only a theory that happens to fit observed behavior.
I swear, I can't figure this guy out. First he tells me he's not going to contact me any further, then I continue to get a dozen or more messages from him. He tells me he will not accept an apology, and 3 hours later makes demands for a public apology. I make the apology, and then he demands it be removed.
Seems like disorganized thinking. I think I remember seeing that term used several times in several court documents. Could it be related?
One thing I clearly noted in my apology was that I was wrong calling joboggi a quack. He also took offense to the term "duck", but I cannot comment on that because I never called him a duck, I only posted an image of a duck. I've never seen his pic, so I don't know if he looks like a duck or not. Because he was offended over the use of a duck, there is possibly some resemblance, but that is only a theory that happens to fit observed behavior.
(0)
(0)
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, or a narcissistic board moderator may delete it because it doesn't support his disjointed thinking, but in the end, there it is.
– Windbag Duckbill
– Windbag Duckbill
Scroll down for more posts ▼