I understand your point and I think it is a fair one and you could very well be correct. But since the Crayola deal I have viewed it slightly differently. I understand the limitations of the Crayola deal completely but for me it introduced the dynamic of a "green story". So for me I am hoping the machine can actually run at sustained up-times with reasonable through-put. I admit that has not been proven yet but based on the need for this type of technology I am hoping a company will take a risk and do a performance pay deal like I have outlined. I think like Crayola even if they lost a little on the process if they can offset it with goodwill and PR they may buy a processor. I think the millions of dollars price tags thrown out there are complete nonsense. And it will take proving the machine to get that kind of price.

Again I appreciate what you are saying and you could be correct. I would be interested in your take on what I describe above.