I hope when people read that article they notice the tone of that article and the writer's previous article.  Total hack job.  While I understand the negative light it shines on EWSI, anyone who remembers the details around the 2trg deal will how long it actually took for the deal to close.  They had plenty of time to on both sides to read the fine print with their respective lawyers involved.  Did you notice the total liability for the leases is 200K but 2trg wants 800K?  Ridiculous.  No idea why they would do that but it just seems shady and maybe they want EWSI to settle for a much lower amount to quiet the issue quickly so 2trg has more money to pay their debts.  Maybe they saw how fast EWSI was growing and figured there was more money that could have been made with their assets - seller's remorse?  I have no idea what the real reason is but I'm trying to make sense of the issue.