Posted On: 02/22/2014 12:24:57 PM
Post# of 39368
Sophie56 In your message you speak of them saying they reported deals that didn't pan out. I am of the camp that the 3.5M agreement in LA is one that didn't pan out.
If I recall, we were going to get revenues in other places besides drilling. This would have been one of them. A bet that didn't happen. It will be interesting to see what comes of the newsletter on Monday. It might be just as vague as many have been last several weeks. I for one don't care much about the court case.
Counting on that for a revenue stream is ridiculous. Shutting them up is most important.
Maybe Reid and company need to visit the shark tank and ask for money in return for a percentage of TECO. Now wouldn't that be a show!!
If I recall, we were going to get revenues in other places besides drilling. This would have been one of them. A bet that didn't happen. It will be interesting to see what comes of the newsletter on Monday. It might be just as vague as many have been last several weeks. I for one don't care much about the court case.
Counting on that for a revenue stream is ridiculous. Shutting them up is most important.
Maybe Reid and company need to visit the shark tank and ask for money in return for a percentage of TECO. Now wouldn't that be a show!!
(0)
(0)
