In light of these updates and an IR contact who's invited our questions/concerns, what additional transparency are we looking for?  It seems to me that these are the avenues they have identified for providing information to shareholders, and IR also posts here (not sure how I feel about that though, given our "audience.").

Now, if the Mitchell sale is the concern (no 8-K) that's possible fair.  But otherwise, it's far better than the alternative so often witnessed in the OTC's where no one is available or never replies, etc.  Now, if there's a real or perceived issue of credibility, again, that's also fair.  But is that the case of late?

This is a situation where it invariably takes more dirt to fill back in the hole than was dug.  Treaty's goal (and indirectly ours) must be to stay out of that hole.  Next step to me is if they are true to the claims of catching up on all reporting, not just drill-drill-drill., although we do need to see oil-oil-oil!

Take care!