Zerify Inc ZRFY

Board Mod: CyberC

Asst Mods: Pugilista baldeagle1 Hate Liars

Last Post: 11/09/2024 11:16:20 AM

Board Marks: 413

Posts Today: 0

Board Views Today: 473

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (SFOR)

Company Website: http://www.strikeforcetech.com/
Channel Partner https://cyberidguard.com/
SafeVchat https://www.safevchat.com/
PrivacyLok https://www.strikeforcetech.com/privacylok/

BlockSafe Technologies, Inc (Subsidiary of StrikeForce Tech)
https://youtu.be/gRkubIogSSk (BlockChainDefender)
https://youtu.be/4_BHe9J7SWQ (CryptoDefender)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwIS63ucmQU&t=17s

Zerify Inc (OTCMRKTS: ZRFY) Stock Message Board

Create New Post View All Posts Board Mark Banned

Post

Subject

Author

Posted On

70425	Terms And Conditions Terms And Conditions Updated (2)	CyberC	07/17/2020 8:28:54 PM
59231	Good Morning $SFOR (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/20/2019 6:31:53 AM
59230	Re: "What did I misunderstand??" "Now, I had (8)	Gold49er	09/20/2019 6:23:25 AM
59225	We cant seem to get it (2)	CashStrapped	09/19/2019 9:30:21 PM
59224	Now, I had understood we were doing something	Caruso	09/19/2019 9:03:39 PM
59223	Good for them -- do we have Blocksafe's (3)	gimli	09/19/2019 7:56:57 PM
59222	Blockstack Raises $23 Million In The First-Ever	Gold49er	09/19/2019 7:51:25 PM
59221	It would be with ACS ..... you'd have to ask Bo.	gimli	09/19/2019 6:54:52 PM
59220	Well, if people bought them and they work, and	Caruso	09/19/2019 4:56:28 PM
59219	Would someone remind me why this is not a (1)	Caruso	09/19/2019 4:48:43 PM
59218	...and Ginsburg. I thought Supreme Court judges	Hi_Lo	09/19/2019 2:09:32 PM
59217	Thank you judge Sotomayor. (1)	Hi_Lo	09/19/2019 2:05:44 PM
59216	https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2019/09/18/trading-tec (9)	gimli	09/19/2019 12:14:41 PM
59206	OCT 1st conference. Thanks (1)	NPike711	09/19/2019 10:15:48 AM
59203	$SFOR https://bit.ly/2kUvyf4 (8)	zpaul	09/19/2019 9:29:10 AM
59202	LTT, if we achieve positive cash flow the excess	undervaluedstocks	09/19/2019 9:29:09 AM
59201	re the potential Hilton deal, I have 2 points: 1. (2)	erieshore	09/19/2019 9:06:32 AM
59200	I hope so U! There are so very, very many good (1)	learningthetruth	09/19/2019 9:03:42 AM
59199	Great insight and very helpful. Thank you.	CyberDollar	09/19/2019 9:01:22 AM
59198	Deals with federal govt take a long time and are (1)	Pugilista	09/19/2019 8:55:01 AM
59197	Yes, and it is something our hard working CEO has (1)	4sleddogs	09/19/2019 8:45:50 AM
59196	Good Morning Sfor (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/19/2019 8:05:29 AM
59195	Thank you for your support of MHO about SFOR (1)	4sleddogs	09/19/2019 7:05:07 AM
59194	Sincere sympathy at your passing since you're a	4sleddogs	09/19/2019 6:47:11 AM
59193	"We are in the Government once, no twice!" CEO (1)	4sleddogs	09/19/2019 6:44:10 AM
59192	Can anyone explain why Guarded / Protect / Mobile	ace thompson	09/19/2019 6:32:58 AM
59191	Hey there 49er - that's 17 brands brother.	RDY2ROCK	09/19/2019 6:17:12 AM
59190	Sir you do NOT need to apologize to anyone for (5)	RDY2ROCK	09/19/2019 5:46:00 AM
59187	Nope! A Federal Government that couldn't pass a (2)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 11:49:34 PM
59185	A little time spent on the US Patent Office site (2)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 10:44:03 PM
59184	How else could McAfee counter polymorphic (3)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 10:39:21 PM
59183	Youre welcome Gold49er. My take is corporate (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/18/2019 8:36:53 PM
59182	I agree sir. Not sure why you are getting thumbs	undervaluedstocks	09/18/2019 8:33:12 PM
59181	Thanks UVS. Is it possible that IS The Martinique (4)	Gold49er	09/18/2019 6:50:24 PM
59179	That the DOD is using McAfee/ACS is an assumption (2)	Hi_Lo	09/18/2019 6:10:57 PM
59178	From reading Ram's MFA/OOBA patent for mobile (6)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 5:34:44 PM
59177	"They do work with the Federal Government" Thank	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 5:26:31 PM
59175	Think about it this way. We are already at about (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/18/2019 4:24:09 PM
59172	It also could be an ACS channel partner: (2)	RDY2ROCK	09/18/2019 4:00:56 PM
59170	We were just shooting the breeze.....read the (1)	gimli	09/18/2019 3:47:35 PM
59169	First of all McAfee is not infringing on SFOR's (1)	Hi_Lo	09/18/2019 3:33:50 PM
59168	Thank you for that post. Some here are making the (1)	Hi_Lo	09/18/2019 3:29:28 PM
59167	Mark says there is a big deal looming. And I (3)	undervaluedstocks	09/18/2019 3:27:35 PM
59166	Because from what I've read it's not really a (1)	Hi_Lo	09/18/2019 3:19:00 PM
59165	One day, soon perhaps, we'll find	gimli	09/18/2019 2:22:22 PM
59164	Perfectly agree but McAfee? For them to betray (1)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 2:15:48 PM
59163	NICE!	BIG FONZ	09/18/2019 2:12:59 PM
59162	True but R2R explained keyloggers are a (2)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 2:12:04 PM
59161	I'd say after 18 years SFOR has gained a fair (2)	gimli	09/18/2019 2:09:24 PM
59160	Wow gimli! I can only hope you are wrong. I did (2)	4sleddogs	09/18/2019 2:02:05 PM
59158	ePO is only a distribution tool for McAfee (3)	Learningtoinvest	09/18/2019 1:43:34 PM