Zerify Inc ZRFY

Board Mod: CyberC

Asst Mods: Pugilista baldeagle1 Hate Liars

Last Post: 11/09/2024 11:16:20 AM

Board Marks: 413

Posts Today: 0

Board Views Today: 4467

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (SFOR)

Company Website: http://www.strikeforcetech.com/
Channel Partner https://cyberidguard.com/
SafeVchat https://www.safevchat.com/
PrivacyLok https://www.strikeforcetech.com/privacylok/

BlockSafe Technologies, Inc (Subsidiary of StrikeForce Tech)
https://youtu.be/gRkubIogSSk (BlockChainDefender)
https://youtu.be/4_BHe9J7SWQ (CryptoDefender)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwIS63ucmQU&t=17s

Zerify Inc (OTCMRKTS: ZRFY) Stock Message Board

Create New Post View All Posts Board Mark Banned

Post

Subject

Author

Posted On

70425	Terms And Conditions Terms And Conditions Updated (2)	CyberC	07/17/2020 8:28:54 PM
59066	It sounds like an offering --- show me paying	gimli	09/14/2019 6:41:12 PM
59065	And what about where it says as a partnership	undervaluedstocks	09/14/2019 6:37:05 PM
59064	At the bottom of the Alliance description: McAfee	gimli	09/14/2019 6:32:49 PM
59063	I'd like to believe that, but all I remember	gimli	09/14/2019 6:30:56 PM
59062	Something way in the back of my foggy brain,	ZYX	09/14/2019 6:22:01 PM
59061	True. They don't, but their Alliance Partner, ACS	4sleddogs	09/14/2019 6:19:22 PM
59060	Call back and tell them you saw ACS listed in	gimli	09/14/2019 4:59:58 PM
59059	I had called Mcafee before and inquired about any	TEXMEX	09/14/2019 4:43:35 PM
59058	Like you "I hope the military is getting better (1)	4sleddogs	09/14/2019 10:36:30 AM
59057	https://twitter.com/cryptoairdropa2/status/117267 (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 8:52:55 PM
59056	Excellent points!	Caruso	09/13/2019 6:09:59 PM
59055	An article I read recently was about companies	ZYX	09/13/2019 5:31:16 PM
59054	Sled, --- In response to your question. It begs (4)	ZYX	09/13/2019 4:47:17 PM
59053	And youre welcome!	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 4:11:36 PM
59052	That question is for anyone who	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 4:07:38 PM
59051	My question on that note is what happens if	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 4:07:15 PM
59050	Thank you for providing that link proving the	4sleddogs	09/13/2019 4:04:40 PM
59049	If not, McAfee is infringing SFOR IP for	4sleddogs	09/13/2019 3:58:15 PM
59047	4th company from top:	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 10:20:25 AM
59046	https://www.mcafee.com/enterprise/en-us/assets/so	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 10:19:05 AM
59045	Its possible sir! Cygate and EndpointLock as a	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 10:17:23 AM
59044	Some fairly recent info regarding 101 from our	Optimistic Trader	09/13/2019 10:14:11 AM
59043	"Anyone else" includes McAfee that is providing	4sleddogs	09/13/2019 10:07:29 AM
59042	Right on...it is about revenue from deals is what	Optimistic Trader	09/13/2019 9:58:48 AM
59041	I feel Blank Rome feels we can have success. So	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 8:11:16 AM
59040	Thanks for this link gimli ...sobering to say the	Goodinvest	09/13/2019 7:54:14 AM
59039	Good Morning $SFOR (2)	undervaluedstocks	09/13/2019 7:48:07 AM
59038	Don't bank on it.... (2)	gimli	09/13/2019 7:47:29 AM
59037	Maybe if congress moves forward to fix Alice this	Goodinvest	09/13/2019 7:40:54 AM
59036	Never give up ! (1)	CyberC	09/12/2019 11:26:17 PM
59033	I will admit Ive been frustrated about the (4)	undervaluedstocks	09/12/2019 8:22:52 PM
59032	You go Hi_Lo, who knew.......	BIG FONZ	09/12/2019 8:17:46 PM
59031	When do we think Berkheimer v HP will be decided	undervaluedstocks	09/12/2019 7:56:14 PM
59030	Yes, and anyone else who would try to use our (1)	Hi_Lo	09/12/2019 7:50:25 PM
59029	Excellent point! Duo would most probably do the	baldeagle1	09/12/2019 7:36:38 PM
59028	I don't think we would need one. In that case SA (3)	Hi_Lo	09/12/2019 7:31:42 PM
59027	I havent found his prior post on the exact	baldeagle1	09/12/2019 7:02:16 PM
59026	Excellent analogy/recap of the Solicitor (3)	baldeagle1	09/12/2019 6:51:06 PM
59025	If anyone knows, would a positive decision in the (1)	Caruso	09/12/2019 6:46:21 PM
59024	Well, thats the most cheerful thinking ive	Caruso	09/12/2019 6:42:59 PM
59023	Because the Supreme Court's Solicitor General was (5)	Hi_Lo	09/12/2019 6:33:07 PM
59022	May I respectfully ask, why you are positive of	Caruso	09/12/2019 6:16:08 PM
59021	Thats true for all of us that believe in SFOR. (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/12/2019 3:40:32 PM
59020	Well said NPike711. I wish all the Naaabeees	BIG FONZ	09/12/2019 3:35:53 PM
59019	Truer words regarding SFOR could not be better	baldeagle1	09/12/2019 3:05:12 PM
59018	That reminds me of the M.C. Hammer throwback (1)	undervaluedstocks	09/12/2019 2:32:04 PM
59017	My advice to everyone- a link to the Dont (1)	baldeagle1	09/12/2019 2:01:36 PM
59016	In my view it is better to understate in guidance (4)	NPike711	09/12/2019 1:58:38 PM
59015	"Would you rather he not say anything?" I would (2)	Hi_Lo	09/12/2019 1:29:23 PM
59013	Would you rather he not say anything? because (2)	Pugilista	09/12/2019 1:15:27 PM