Member Profile DanH | Latest Posts

DanH

Send Private Message

Follow Member

Block Messages

Ignore This User

Displaying 251-300 of 580 result(s).

Board Name	Posts By DanH	Post Created
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Right there with you. Remember, fri	07/28/2016 10:56:43 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	There are only two pieces of data t (5)	07/26/2016 4:41:40 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I think that is a good assumption (1)	07/11/2016 11:18:03 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I liked what you were doing at firs (1)	07/07/2016 10:21:57 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I like the manner in which you chos (2)	07/07/2016 9:57:42 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	They reported a fact. That is what (1)	07/07/2016 4:28:36 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I believe losses can be carried for (2)	07/07/2016 12:14:34 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	It is not unprofessional to tell a (3)	06/30/2016 5:44:17 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	And NITE is acting like a dillutor (2)	06/29/2016 1:43:55 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I know this one :): Net operating l (4)	06/29/2016 10:25:23 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Again, I say, retiring shares and R (3)	06/29/2016 9:57:25 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	VNDM is up showing 4m shares. I don	06/27/2016 12:19:26 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	What is Ihub? Never heard of them? (4)	06/25/2016 1:18:35 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I think as "ass" moderator, he shou (1)	06/24/2016 12:54:53 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Looks like that 5m is back up ....	06/24/2016 9:41:44 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	You are confusing this board with a (4)	06/23/2016 2:20:02 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	It would reduce the rampantly growi	06/23/2016 1:40:31 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I would to propose this board move (5)	06/23/2016 12:50:57 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	That's big picture thinking right t (2)	06/22/2016 7:47:06 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I haven't seen any evidence of thin (1)	06/22/2016 9:12:32 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Now NITE is on top.	06/21/2016 1:59:17 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Somebody hit them for 50k right aft	06/21/2016 1:57:44 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I hit them when they were showing 1 (2)	06/21/2016 1:47:04 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Doebop is in the house! I like how	06/21/2016 11:24:11 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	If this holds, those "non-existent"	06/21/2016 11:22:37 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Every board needs comic relief. We	06/21/2016 10:53:38 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Is he an athletic supporter? (2)	06/21/2016 10:06:28 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Absolutely incorrect! They are only (5)	06/20/2016 6:12:28 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	The majority of those preferred sha (1)	06/20/2016 6:00:34 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	worldwide!	06/20/2016 3:42:37 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Just got to that. It reinforces my (4)	06/20/2016 3:32:39 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	It looks like two SLA's with identi	06/20/2016 3:23:23 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	10q is posted $109,140 in sales is (1)	06/20/2016 3:08:35 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I see that, I'm learning to read Tr	06/20/2016 12:06:12 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	1.8 M at the time of the hit. I was	06/20/2016 11:51:36 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	That should have wiped out the 16's (1)	06/20/2016 11:34:31 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I did not see a reason to correct t	06/17/2016 3:02:01 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I took those 15's. I wonder if he a (2)	06/17/2016 1:28:53 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Loan Processing: This is in respons (3)	06/16/2016 8:41:18 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Those last transactions were paint	06/15/2016 4:00:56 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	It would only need to say "from the (1)	06/15/2016 2:50:37 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	Here is my original post on both bo (1)	06/15/2016 2:32:41 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	So, I predicted the run-up would st (1)	06/15/2016 2:08:40 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	On the time and sales page I see in	06/15/2016 12:30:48 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	16s are gone, 17s are up if i read (1)	06/15/2016 12:23:04 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	I saw the statement this morning wh (4)	06/15/2016 9:16:10 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	That works for me, thanks BigSteve (1)	06/15/2016 8:55:42 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	To be accurate, he did not. And to (4)	06/15/2016 8:31:10 AM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	1 Its due 45 calendar days from the (2)	06/14/2016 4:33:17 PM
TPAC Trans-Pacific Aerospace	This is unfortunate. Timeliness is	06/14/2016 2:47:29 PM

Recent Articles