as a person who had spent 3 years in graduate scho

as a person who had spent 3 years in graduate school perfoming research at the Idaho National Lab, I can tell you that data can be interpreted and dissected in a miriad of ways. It is COMPLETELY in the realm of possibility that BMSN researchers saw their data one way and that FDA reviewers are seeing the data differently or slightly differently. Have any of you published a peer review publication? I have and tell me its not something I enjoyed on 3 separate occasions. Basically the task of reviewers  (and in this case the FDA) is to try an tear your conclusions and data apart to find faults, errors, or misinterpretations. its part of the critical review process and trust me, when it involves human health the scrutiny must be elevated. So I am not concerned from that perspective. 

I am concerned about PG loosing faith! have a good weekend. salut!