No, I am sorry but you are incorrect. FYI, NAPSTE
Post# of 45510
Posted On: 09/11/2013 12:04:27 AM
Re: psychtrader #35823
No, I am sorry but you are incorrect. FYI, NAPSTER wasn't even the START of freeware sharing.
I was watching illegal movies and piracy on HULU before you probably ever even heard about it, yes they had ad's but I assure you they had cam movie vids as well as movies and t.v shows that would air the same week. It was a piracy streaming website.
Once it was bought out they took down the site, restructured the site, and made it legit. I like how you posted all the merger news with nothing backed up with proof that they did not start as a piracy website, you think these big names wanted people to know they took over HULU, the piracy site, and turned it into what it is now?
I am referring to when HULU was nothing more than an A-Z for movies and T.V shows with lists of things you could watch. Or are you too young to remember that? There were ad's on the site but rest assured, no ad's, not while you were watching a movie or show.
Yes, he is worth more than some of the companies suing him and has more backing than most of them. You act like the whole entire entertainment industry is suing him/FilmOn. Like I said before this verdict will effect Hulu, Netflix, Flixster, Amazon, Apple, so Laws will be made.
I am out for the night and I am not going to argue about something I know to be true because I used the site when it was a piracy site. Before it became what you "Think" you know about it now. Piracy was a new thing then and Remember the victors tell the story and when the site was sold because they liked the concept, the Victors wrote the story.
I was watching illegal movies and piracy on HULU before you probably ever even heard about it, yes they had ad's but I assure you they had cam movie vids as well as movies and t.v shows that would air the same week. It was a piracy streaming website.
Once it was bought out they took down the site, restructured the site, and made it legit. I like how you posted all the merger news with nothing backed up with proof that they did not start as a piracy website, you think these big names wanted people to know they took over HULU, the piracy site, and turned it into what it is now?
I am referring to when HULU was nothing more than an A-Z for movies and T.V shows with lists of things you could watch. Or are you too young to remember that? There were ad's on the site but rest assured, no ad's, not while you were watching a movie or show.
Yes, he is worth more than some of the companies suing him and has more backing than most of them. You act like the whole entire entertainment industry is suing him/FilmOn. Like I said before this verdict will effect Hulu, Netflix, Flixster, Amazon, Apple, so Laws will be made.
I am out for the night and I am not going to argue about something I know to be true because I used the site when it was a piracy site. Before it became what you "Think" you know about it now. Piracy was a new thing then and Remember the victors tell the story and when the site was sold because they liked the concept, the Victors wrote the story.
(0)
(0)